subscribe via rss
9 Mar 2010

Can You Really Make a Living Selling Microstock Photography?

Burning American money with Benjamin Franklins face appearing on fire on a one hundred dollar bill.

I hear this a lot from those looking into microstock to earn a full time living.  Questions like this come up frequently on microstock forums, twitter and facebook.  How many images will I need?  What can I make hourly?  Is building up a sizable microstock portfolio even worth the effort?

Now this article is not an article just to try and discourage people from giving it a shot, or attempting to discourage breeding my own new competition.  There are bazillion other blogs, books, and ebooks online where you can learn “How to make a living selling stock photography” and obviously there are already hundreds of thousands of contributors worldwide.  No one stock photographer or illustrator is alike, considering that everyone has their own style, their own work ethic, their own methods – to each his own.  Who am I to give my opinion?  I’m nobody special, just your average creatively minded computer geek.  I have been making a full time living for 2 solid years now.   My 2 years full time was built upon 2.5 prior years selling stock part time (approx 5-10 hrs a week) while working full time at a graphic design dayjob; the field I actually have my BA in.  So I’ve been in this stock business a solid 4.5 years… that’s not a very long time, but then again this biz is still very young.  4.5 years isn’t much less time than some of the top selling microstockers, either (ie: Yuri Arcurs and Andres Rodriguez to name a few of the top dogs).  In this short period of time, I’ve learned and experienced more first hand in this business than I can even put into words in a Tuesday morning blog post.  With just a little over 5000 stock images, I still just consider myself a small fish in a big pond.

Here is my take on getting started in the business – straight up, no chaser.

If you’re just starting out right now… in 2010-11, I honestly think you’re going to need a prayer to initiate your momentum and to start earning enough images to make a living. I started back in late 05, early 06 – I was paying my mortgage by mid 07 and then went all out full time with the loss of my full time day job in mid 2008. If I waited until now, and transitioned from part time in stock to full time, I don’t think that I would make it. Things were much different back then, too.  It was much less difficult to get images approved (if you can’t get past that hurdle, you aren’t going to be able to sell them obviously) and it was much easier to get lots of downloads on simple subjects. It seems like every few years in stock it’s more of an uphill battle. In 06 you could submit a pile of crap, and still sell it like hotcakes. Technically imperfect photos, even. Now you’d better have your skills sharp and be able to hang with the rest of your competition just to get sales.

If you consider yourself an amateur and just want to make $100 a month just uploading a couple of new images each week, sure that’s definitely possible. If you’re looking to make $1000+ a month on a newer portfolio, you’re going to need to have a long road ahead of you, unless your work fills some sort of crazy un-touched niche with high commercial demand. Can you live off $1000 a month? Maybe if you live in India or Asia.  I wish I could.  In the area of the United States I live in, that won’t even pay the average mortgage or rent for the month.

Global Network of People Montage of the earth with a global network of people from all walks of life on different continents isolated over white. Clipping path included. Earth photo courtesy of NASA. 	3D, Abstract, America, background, ball, Black, Blue, Business, campaign, Chain, chrome, Circle, collage, communication, Computer, connections, crowd, crowdsourcing, cultures, design, Diversity, Earth, figure, frame, framework, global, Globe, graphic, group, growth, hemisphere, illustration, internet, isolated, latin, link, Map, marketing, men, message, Metal, montage, network, Networking, North, object, orbit, orbs, peace, People, photos, planet, Reflection, Retro, round, shape, shine, shiny, silver, smiles, smiling, Social, source, South, sphere, spherical, success, teamwork, web, White, wide, wire, women, World, worldwide

Saying you want to sell stock is one thing – doing it and actually continually maintaining momentum in it is another. Putting up with the submission process; the keywording, uploading, and pushing the images through on the agency back-ends (all the tedious parts) is another thing that stops 99% of people in their tracks. They realize all of the work in it, and are either too lazy or just get discouraged from lack of sales.  When it comes to stock – you either “get it”, or you just don’t. Some grasp at straws taking pics of churches, shooting fruit over white or zoo animals all day, while others create useful, commercial imagery. This is going to be the largest hurdle for most contributors, used to producing nice prints for their living room walls.

So here is what you need to make it:

- Self motivation (Are you a motivated self-starter? Can you stay on task without getting distracted while working alone from home? If not you might as well not even bother with microstock)
- Creativity… enough to choke a cow
- Business sense!  At least as much if not more than creativity
- Quality gear to accomplish whatever it is you’re shooting the most, I’d say an initial investment of $2000-4000 at minimum to cover most of your bases – computers/cameras/lenses/studio gear (don’t even waste your time with consumer point and shoots, unless you like getting over 50% of your images rejected for technical quality)
- Technical skills both in camera and off (Adobe Photoshop knowledge can make or break you in this business. If you’re lacking, you’d better hit the books or don’t bother uploading at all)
- Tons of regular uploads.  Take whatever you think is a lot to produce each week, and add 50 to that number.
- Good keywording skills (something that takes a lot of time to develop, for most)
- Ability to set and reach hourly / daily / monthly / yearly goals
- Lots of quality and variety
- Quantity quantity quantity in addition to high quality (a portfolio of 3000 images is the “new” 1000 – but 3000 crap images has the sales potential as a portfolio of 300 excellent ones)
- Patience, persistence, and a backup income before you get the stock ball rolling

Us full time microstockers are in the minority – I’d estimate there are probably under 500 in the world. Who knows?  I wish I knew the actual figures, but that would be a tricky statistic to pin down.  I’m not talking RM/ traditional stock sellers, but those that are strictly making their income with microstock, exclusively, whether they are working for one agency and an exclusive artist or they are using multiple agencies to sell their work.  We are a rare breed, and a lot of us are probably crazy for even attempting this feat :)   One thing you can’t expect from this business is to get rich off of it.  Gone are the days of making money from the snapshots laying around on your hard drive (heck, I myself even claimed that back in 2006 – because that was truly the case back then – but not anymore).   If you’re the type of individual that wants to earn a higher than average income, then you’re definitely barking up the wrong tree here.  It’s taken the seasoned pros years just to develop a portfolio strong enough, large enough, and good enough to consistently earn them a steady monthly income.  Don’t expect for this to be a quickly profitable start-up business without any sacrifice or years of “paying your dues”.

A 3D pie chart vector graphic with three staggered pieces. 	3D, Abstract, background, Black, Business, chart, Circle, colorful, Commerce, concept, Data, diagram, domination, economic, finance, Financial, graph, growth, icon, illustration, info, information, Investment, Market, marketing, money, object, Orange, part, percentage, performance, pie, piece, plan, presentation, profit, Red, report, research, result, sales, Share, slice, statistics, success, symbol, system, vector, web, Yellow

If you’re going to attempt this, you need to treat it like a start-up business.  40-60 hrs a week will be necessary, working diligently and taking a stab at it.  After a few months you should then evaluate your time & cost vs earnings ration.  Time is money, so if you are seeing a decent return for all of your hard work right off the bat, then there is your answer whether or not you might be able to make it as a full time microstock contributor.  Otherwise, you might conclude that stock is a rainy day side hobby to dabble in whenever you’re bored or needing some extra cash for new gear or to take your wife out to dinner.  If you haven’t noticed, I don’t blog super regularly.  My blogging is highly intermittent.  I’m sorry, that’s just pretty much due to the fact that I’m too busy working, as a one-man operation.  I limit myself to a 40 hour work week, because money isn’t everything to me.  I work to live; I don’t live to work.  When you work for yourself you have to limit yourself; unless of course you want to be a burnt out workaholic that doesn’t have a happy family, spiritual, or any type of other life. I digress.

Do you already consider yourself a pro photographer, because you’re making a living in the wedding or portrait business?  Sorry to burst your bubble, but micro is an entirely different animal.  Please try not to go into it thinking you’re going to be all set and that it’s going to be a piece of cake for you, just because you’ve been a seasoned pro photog for years and years.  I’ve heard many stories of this happening.  You’re still going to have just as much learning curve as the amateurs will, just as any of us did back when we started.  The harsh reality of the nazi-ish microstock quality standards are enough to turn even the best of photographers away from this business.

Timing is everything, so I can understand why there are so many blog posts online explaining how the ship as sailed to be able to have a full time microstock living.  I respectfully disagree with that for those microstock contributors who already have their foot in the door with a large collection of images, established and already selling.  Given the continual move of buyers away from RM and more to budget RF images, as well as the continual movement towards digital media of all types in our daily lives.  If you are currently sell microstock part or full time, and are making a decent living, consider yourself a rare breed.  I wish everyone success in whatever creative field you’re involved in, and hope that my honest evaluation of the business in this article has helped those considering microstock as a career choice.  I’m tired of all of the nay-sayers and doom and gloom discussed about this business.  Remember too that there are a thousand ways to make a living in any creative field; it just depends what you want to set your mind to, and focus on in your own business.  If the microstock market tanks and us full time contributors can’t continue getting by, forcing us to explore other avenues of income, then it is what it is.  Only time will tell.  Life will go on, and many of us well know there are countless other niches areas of this creative field that we can pursue.  In the meantime, best wishes and happy selling!

For a list of agencies you can sell your photos, graphics, and vector illustrations, that I think are actually worthwhile (in other words, where there are actual sales); read this post.

ArenaCreative.com highly recommends The Expanded Microstock Photographer’s Guide Ebook by Rasmus Rasmussen - digital download only $8.50

If you are serious about microstock photography, the best way you can hit the ground running is to learn from the pros.  Rasmus Rasmussen has been working in the microstock business as a contributing photographer and also an editor for over 10 years.  In his updated ebook, he takes you in-depth into what it really takes to make it in this business, not as just a side hobby, but as a career.  Check out The Expanded Microstock Photographer’s Guide ebook today.  After reading it myself, I really think it has all of the necessary tidbits of insider info that I wish I had known, back 7 years ago when starting out in microstock.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.reddotstudio.ch hfng

    Another excellent post! Selling stock is hard work even for seasoned submitter. For newbies, it is definitely an uphill battle as you have rightly said .. provided of course they can get approved as a submitter. Lol.

  • http://arenacreative.com/ arenacreative

    You’re absolutely right hfng – even getting approved to sell on istockphoto and shutterstock has proven to become increasingly more difficult as the years go on. As more time goes by, we have to make sure, as artists, that our technical skills and quality continue to increase. With the ever-declining cost of DSLRs, the doors are wide open for new ones to give it a shot, as long as they can get past the gate-keepers :D …the photo reviewers and inspectors.

  • http://www.niltomil.com Matt Antonino

    Definitely the best article on the subject and probably the best on this blog. Great stuff – now get back to work!

  • Ayesha

    Straight to the point, thanks for your honesty, I dont think I have the committment to make it work full time :D

  • http://www.picNiche.com Bob Davies

    Probably the best post on becoming a microstock photographer in the last couple years :) I agree completely :)
    Btw, nice blog!! :) Adding in next version :)

  • http://blog.microstockgroup.com Tyler Olson

    Nice article. A good contrast to the ‘get rich quick’ articles that seem to populate the internet.

    I don’t think there is ever enough of the best in any field, no matter how saturated it is, so if someone was REALLY one of the best I think there is more than enough room for them in microstock. The truth is however, that very few ARE the best, and even then it is an uphill battle. Your post paints a very realistic picture.

  • http://www.mystockphoto.org mystockphoto

    Sir Todd,
    this is in my unquestionable judgement the “2010 manifesto for the microstockers”.
    Thanks for sharing… as I see your time is precious for keeping make a living selling Microstock Photography :-)
    roberto

  • http://www.nicemonkey.co.uk Nicemonkey

    Great blog Todd, insightful and to the point although I cant condone choking a cow with your creativity!

  • http://microstockexperiment.blogspot.com/ Laurent

    At least a non biased article on microstock earnings, well done Todd!

  • http://arenacreative.com/ arenacreative

    @Matt @Ayesha @Bob @Tyler @Roberto and @Laurent: Thank you guys for all of your sentiments – very much appreciated. I think that there will definitely always be room for new niches in this industry, but the challenge is going to be focusing on the ones that will yield results. New ones are popping up daily, so every so often we need to be sure that we’re awake to the times we’re living in.

    @Tyler – very good point. There will always be room for artists to rise up and become better than they once were, and this new era of available/affordable technology is breeding a lot of fresh young talent. If I was able to teach myself my way around a DSLR in just a couple of years, a lot of others would be able to as well. I believe some artists move up rather fast, and others struggle (or get into a comfort zone). It’s always fun to take a look at your first 100 images once in a while, and take a good laugh at yourself :) If you don’t do that, you’re not going to see your progress.

    Even still, it’s unfortunate that microstock is way more than shooting and being creative. I’d say I am shooting about 5 or 10% of the time, and the rest of it is spent culling, editing, keywording, uploading, pushing. It’s the part of this line of work that is the “job” part – there’s no easy way around it. Every job has its tedious “tasks” if you will, and that’s probably one of the largest hurdles in becoming a full time stock photographer – the insane amount of repetitive and boring tasks. I actually enjoy the editing, and the uploading/pushing is a piece of cake with the right tools (thanks to friends of ours like Bob Davies with picniche.com and the toolbars). The image keywording is definitely my least favorite part of this career choice ;)

  • http://ericcote.squarespace.com Eric Cote

    Great article Todd. It’s a very good evaluation of the microstock industry. I’m tired of all the doom sayers these days so it’s nice to read an article telling it like it is really.
    Thanks

  • http://arenacreative.com/ arenacreative

    I’m sick of hearing about all the doom and gloom too, Eric :) Thanks man

    Check out further discussion on this topic on the Microstock Group Forums:
    http://www.microstockgroup.com/newby-discussion/can-i-really-earn-a-full-time-income-from-microstock/

  • http://www.focalpop.com Becky Parker

    Great post, Todd! Really interesting to hear your take on this matter.
    Out of curiosity, would you encourage new photographers to explore a career in assignment photography instead of stock?

  • http://www.microstockposts.com/ Microstock Posts

    Great stuff. I like blogs like this which show the reality. Still too many blogs out there, giving it the old “upload your photos and get rich” jargon. I missed out on the days when microstock was new and you could throw any half decent and even not so decent photos at them. Sometimes I get that experience with new microstock agencies, but the new agencies don’t stand much of a chance of catching up to the established sites. Not sure if I’ll ever make a living selling microstock photography. I do live in Southeast Asia though, so $1000 a month would be more than enough to say I’m making a living.

  • http://arenacreative.com/ arenacreative

    @nicemonkey Don’t worry, no cows were creatively choked in the making of this blog post :)

    @Becky: I would encourage new photographers or graphic designers to test the waters in whatever they are interested in pursuing, but to make sure after their trial run they’re not spinning their wheels wasting time and money on something that isn’t going to give them a decent return. Like I said, there are a thousand areas to focus on in each of these businesses. Some might want to strictly shoot pet photography, others sports or weddings. One designer might focus on corporate identity or logo design, while another strictly sticks to illustration or 3D animation. I’m only talking about what I know here, I can honestly count on one hand the number of times I’ve shot on assignment (not for stock) so I don’t think I’m one to really comment on that side of things.

    @microstock posts: That’s awesome if you can make a living there that cheap, I always joke with my wife about us moving somewhere like that for the same reason – and also because I love looking at palm trees and tropical surroundings. Not sure if I’d be able to get used to the hot and sticky humid climate though. Singapore and parts of Malaysia I hear are pretty nice.

  • http://microstuck.blogspot.com Dave

    This article is very very good. I agree 99% here except that perhaps it is difficult to categorize who is making what amount of money if not everyone reports their earnings online. I do believe it is a small amount of the microstock photographers, by far. I tossed a link to this articule on my blog, I feel it is a good read for anyone!

    -dave
    microstuck.blogspot.com

  • http://www.photo-phantasy.com Samantha

    I ended up directed to this blog out of curiosity on Twitter (by @photojack), and it’s intriguing. Stock is one of those things that I learned about while I was in school, had it played up for me while I was in there and stuff; but ultimately chose not to take part in because I had other ideas.

    Now with the economy so bust I’m looking to do anything just to have a little bit of spending money, and stock’s been floating back into my brain. Hearing this very real view about what it’s like gives me a bit of hope that maybe it would be possible to supplement some income with it, somehow. I have no intentions of being a stock photographer as a living, but an extra $100 at the end of the month to put towards a new lens or something would be nice. Or as emergency cash. LOL

    But the best part about it is that it’s refreshing to hear a real view on the whole matter. I manage a photography forum and one of our members can stop going on about stock photography and that he’s going to get into it. But in the same breath he can’t tell us how to properly expose a photo, and just bought his first lower-end DSLR at WalMart. I’ve shared this article there to hopefully help get his head out of the clouds, since neither myself nor my staff (one who does stock photography, even) have managed to get through to him. I hope you can.

    Thanks for all the great information!

    -Samantha Genier

  • http://www.microstockphoto.co.uk claudio

    Great article! very balanced and honest in highlightning microstock opportunities while also reporting difficulties

  • Music Converter

    I have to say that arenacreative.com is really a good website

  • Pingback: Exploring stock photography visions | My Stock Photography

  • http://www.truphotos.com gnohz

    Very insightful post. And I’m grateful to see a very honest one too. Too many sites are just telling you to upload and get rich, when the reality is far from that. With every passing year, it seems that more time and effort is needed to maintain one’s portfolio and earnings as well.

    From what I can see, although the business and lifestyle genres seems to be getting more and more saturated, it still seems to be the best selling sector. For the other categories, a much larger portfolio might be required to obtain substantial earnings compared to the best selling categories, say 3000-5000 images compared to 1000.

  • albertpaul68

    Hi!

    I’ve got some experience with microstock photography, I participated into it over a year (my first months in stock industry). What can I say? Well it brings some money, but… why to do it if we can try normal stock agencies? Microstock agencies usually give You about 20% of the price of the image (they get 80% of it)… and so You get (in the best case) few $ from photograph. If You would sell the same image at normal stock agency like a Photoshelter (Now I’m photoshelter.com stock photographer) You get 70% of price (the agency takes only 30%). The price of image is far higher, and It can give You really nice income (for example, licence for publishing image at Bilboard in one country will bring You about 4000$ quit), If you sell Your Royalty Free license image at microstock it will cost only few bucks and they will be able to put it on every bilboard across the world with that silly price. Is it right? You paid few thousand bucks for camera body, lenses, flashlights, computer, and other things, You spend time to shoot, then edit and add keywords… they get 80% and… Is Your work worth so little money? I got one life, and want to get the best incomes from my work. That is why I left microstock (I still have in microstock portfolios some of my older, weak photographs from the beginning). Now every of my stock photographs are in Photoshelter. I do sale less photographs, but the incomes from these are far better than at all microstock sites I participated. Price Yourself.

  • Lisa Mansueti

    good article, I just spent a bunch of money for a micro stock workshop. learned stuff but a mixed bag.
    Have a background in retail and visual know the whole marketing, photoshop,shoot, design thing.
    Do the try for acceptance see what happens.
    I want to do this for back up income.
    got fired after 30 years. still need the full time gig.
    but hey why not try. got a good eye and I think lots of stock is cheesy. They screw you in money.
    I get that. Beggars cannot be choosy.
    Everybody screws you.

  • http://www.focusonstock.com John

    I do make a comfortable living as a full-time stock photographer. I’ve been contributing exclusive with an agency since 2006. Don’t let anyone discourage you, dreams can come true!

    • http://arenacreative.com/ arenacreative

      Same here, John – 100% of my income is from stock photography as well. My point of this post wasn’t to discourage anyone. Just being honest, and giving my evaluation… you really can accomplish anything you set your mind to. I started back in late 2005, early 2006 as well. To those that want to start out now, though, it’s going to be an entirely different story than it was for us. It takes a while to build up a portfolio, no matter how good your images are. The images have to get indexed in the search engines, and of the engines on each agency. That takes times for some sites, in order for your work to ferment and mature, where it starts yielding more sales. Those that started out full time in microstock back in 2004-2005 are sitting pretty now, because their hottest selling images continued to get pushed to the top of the list. Even today, those images are found much easier than images uploaded last week. This doesn’t apply to every single agency, as each one is set up a little bit differently. Overall, I’ve even seen lots of really talent photographers, some even from RM, start in microstock and start dumping their images into the system, only to find that sales are slow and harder to get the ball rolling.

  • http://www.shutterstock.com/cat.mhtml?gallery_id=342667 Jameschipper21@yahoo.co.uk

    great blog, really enjoyed reading it one of the more honest and frank posts i have seen, cutting the bull and to the point. Im a vector contributor on the sites. under the name jameschipper i earn on average $550 a month and have been going under two years submitting around 30/35 a month images, if anyone need any help getting started in vectors or how to maximise your income send me an email. jameschipper21@yahoo.co.uk

  • Karls

    I stumbled on this post by chance and the examples of stock I see on this page are fairly poor. It actually gave me the idea to start selling stock because of these bad examples.

  • http://www.whoisbid.com Whoisbid

    Time is everything…. I think we need to work 100 hour weeks at least if the site/domain is new. Google is really making it difficult for anything new and that is why we are seeing millions of people flock to social networks to spend time getting useless links that they believe will one day help them but those networks probably have 1/1000 th of the power of true backlinks from powerful sites.
    I know I am being very fundamentalist in my statements but anyone can try something new if they want and see what happens. BTW.. This site I am using is new and it is 170 pages of 100% unique content in 5 months and the stats still suck compared to something 5 years old with 1/2 the effort involved.
    I think you need to say many prayers if you want to get into stock photography in 2011. Arena is giving good advice. I advise people do something more profitable like selling their body parts ..LOL! I am kidding about the body parts ok?

  • Pingback: Travel Photo Challenge Microstock Earnings Potential | PICTURE PENNIES

  • Firoza

    Hello Arena :) Your writing about microstock is really very useful. Thank you for this sincere writing. I’m from Nepal and $100 a month is really enough to live here. I’d be really happy if I can make $1000 or even $500 in a month by selling photos to microstock. I don’t have a DSLR and I’m going crazy by reading bazillion reviews of DSLRs and lenses, I’m not able to afford to buy even an entry level dslr with a kit lens at the moment. But I do have a bridge camera Kodak P88 and I think I’m good enough at playing with photoshop.
    I don’t know how good are Bigstockphoto and canstockphoto is but I submitted 3 photos at canstock the day before yesterday and to my surprise canstock approved all the three images. I got more confident and submitted 7 more images to canstock and the same ten images to bigstockphoto. I’m really happy that all the ten photos got approved by both bigstockphoto and canstockphoto. I hadn’t expected that all the images shot by a bridge camera would be accepted. Maybe those ten photos won’t be accepted by istockphoto, shutterstock etc. I’m not sure if they’ll sell well or not, I guess I’ll need to upload about 1000 images. Can you tell me what kind of images have you contributed to microstock? I have uploaded two photos of an egg, 3 photos of butterfly, a photo of a medicine and a glass of water on the background, one landscape, one sunrise, two photos of clouds, one photo of a glass of water with ligthting. I like to take photos of nature, landscape, people, trees, close-up etc.

    • http://blog.arenacreative.com/ ArenaCreative.com Stock Photos

      I am proud of you Firoza! Keep it up, and keep shooting. It won’t be long before you earn enough to buy your first DSLR! I wish I could live off of $100 per month. A month!? That is amazing. Where I live you are still struggling to get by even if you can earn $100 a day. You can do a lot with a point and shoot if you know Photoshop, though. Lately my favorite subjects are sports, food, and portraiture, but that tends to change from time to time. I’ve got around 7000 images, just click the header graphic of this blog page to see my stuff if you’d like. I’ve never been a niche shooter, I’ve always shot a variety of subjects, and designed stock illustrations and graphics in a variety of subjects. I think I might move where you live, I want to live for $100 per month. You can’t even rent a camp site with nothing but dirt on it over here in the United States for $100 per month. LOL

      • Firoza

        Thank you Arena. I’m sorry but I didn’t understand whether you meant images by saying ‘just click the header graphic of this blog page to see my stuff…’ or this http://disqus.com/arenacreative/ or this one http://blog.arenacreative.com/

        Could you tell me which camera and lenses did you use at the starting of selling photos to microstock and which camera and lens are you using now. My uncle is a rich person and he was planning to sell a little part of his land and he had told me that he’d buy me a DSLR and a lens so I had thought of buying eos 7D with ef-s 17-55mm IS USM constant f/2.8 or ef 24-105L f/4. But due to some reason he didn’t sell. Now my father is saying that he’ll buy me a DSLR within 3 months but he can’t afford the 7D with such expensive lens. So I was thinking of 550D with Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8 – f/4 I think this lens cost around $450. Do you think an entry level dslr with a kit lens will do? Lets see how much I can make with my bridge camera before I can get a DSLR. Can you give me some advise on what kind of images sells the most (I can’t afford to hire people to pose as business people like Yuri Arcurs and others) besides business people? What’s your bestselling images? Can I see your photos in stcok sites?

        I think you’ll like the nature of Nepal. Most of the degree holders earn about $200-$250 in a month and average people earn around $100 in a month. My friend’s mother earns $110 in a month and they both live with that money and even save $10-20 in a month. $100 in a month for a single person in Nepal is really enough unless you want to eat food items and alcohol imported from USA or European countries. Nepal has a rich geography. The mountainous north has eight of the world’s ten tallest mountains, including the highest point on Earth, Mount Everest, called Sagarmatha in Nepali.

        This is from wikipedia In 1998, Microsoft Executive John Wood took a trekking vacation to Nepal. While backpacking in the Himalayas, he met a middle-aged Nepalese man who invited him to visit a school in a neighboring village. Hoping for a chance to “see the real Nepal,” John accepted the invitation.

        Arriving at the school, John was shocked by its lack of educational opportunities and resources. When the school’s headmaster showed him the library, John saw that it contained only four books — backpacker castoffs — kept under lock and key.[3] John knows that his adult life was forever changed by the words of that headmaster, who said to him, “Perhaps, sir, you will someday come back with books.”[4]

        Moved by that experience in Nepal, John enlisted friends and family to participate in a book drive for that school and, one year later, he returned to Nepal –- accompanied by his father –- to deliver 3,000 donated books, carried by a train of donkeys. In 1999, John left his career at Microsoft to devote himself full-time to helping bring high-quality educational resources to children in Nepal.

        I’m not a nationalist, patriot. The world is one and I don’t give a shit about countries and boundaries.

        Thank you.

        • http://blog.arenacreative.com/ ArenaCreative.com Stock Photos

          I meant if you would like to see my stock photography portfolio, just go to my main domain arenacreative.com – this page you’re viewing now is just my blog section. Clicking the main logo at the top of the page, or clicking “home” above will bring you there. I’m on all of the other agencies as well, listed in this post here: http://t.co/m2XFRGf

          I would recommend any basic DSLR and kit lens, to start out… http://amzn.to/jx3CM4 once you feel you have reached your limits with your point and shoot. Pretty soon I am going to make a “What’s In My Gear Bag” post with my equipment list, and I think you might be very surprised to see I don’t even own very many high end lenses. I shoot a 10-megapixel crop sensor 40D still, battery gripped, with the hand grip instead of the strap – just the feel I prefer. If you like Canon, I’d say get any EOS series camera, even a 20D, 40D, or Rebel used at a cheap price, and start there with basic lenses. 50mm f1.8 is still a lens I use regularly, and it’s only $80 USD. Same with the 18-55 IS http://amzn.to/lBhm74 which has really low CA, tack sharp, great autofocus and color. Variable aperture when you zoom is a little of a pain, but I’ve learned to work around it. For models I mainly use friends, family, people I meet day to day. The 7D is a great choice, as is the 17-55 IS – I would love to grab one of those. I briefly purchased a 24-70 but it was so heavy for my liking. I’ll get the 24-70 f2.8 L when I upgrade to a DSLR that is full frame. On a crop sensor, you’re much better off with the 17-55 f2.8 IS. If you want to go el cheapo, for $100 used USD you can get an 18-55 IS kit lens, aperture range f3.5-5.6 and I honestly still shoot with that little plastic fantastic lens regularly. If you know what you’re doing with it, you learn how to squeeze the most juice out of it. I think it’s the most lens for the money, along with the 50mm f1.8 http://amzn.to/lsLo92 prices are a little bit higher right now since the Japan Tsunami and earthquakes hit, shutting down production operations

          What sells the best? Still trying to figure that one out myself :) I think anything will sell, as long as it’s done well enough. Be creative, and approach niche subjects as best as you can. Don’t copy others, get ideas from viewing other photos in the world around you, but try to put your own spin on the subjects, perspectives, etc.

          I am the least nationalistic person you will meet, as well. I’m sure India is a gorgeous place, and as much as I would love to move to a far away place and live like a king on the same income I currently make, the fear of doing such a thing outweighs the perks for me. I’m mostly Italian (but don’t speak the languge) I only speak English and a bit of Spanish, and I know very little about the area of Asia and Asia minor. In the end, I think we all are just more comfortable staying in a place we are familiar with, and close to family. Not sure I could leave everything and everyone I know behind just for the prospect of living at a much lower cost somewhere else, it’s just that money isn’t everything to me. It’s just a means to an end, we need it to get by – but that’s it. It’s all just vanity, past your basic needs. I’m a strong believer in trying to keep a simple eye. If things were so bad where I was struggling for even basic needs like a roof over our heads and food and water, or lived in a war torn area, I would definitely consider relocating.

          I didn’t realize that’s where Mount Everest was! Very cool

          Best wishes in your endeavors, and thanks for all of your great comments – much appreciated. There is very little interaction on this blog, so it’s nice to talk to someone like you on here that is so like minded.

          • Firoza

            You have a great collection of images I liked your abstract, landscape, sports photos and others too. Are you in some of the photos yourself? I’ve already felt that I’ve reached the peak of my current camera and I really need a DSLR. I’ve used 4 DSLRs of my friends for a while and I just love the optical viewfinder of DSLR and everything in it. Now I understand why you named your site arenacreative, because you can take great photos even with a kit lens and a prime lens like 50mm 1.8 coupled with a 40D cropped sensor. Now it inspires me even more because of the fact that even an entry level dslr with a kit lens can do when handled by a creative person.

            I just saw your 7D vs 5D II article. I’m a huge fan of 7D and the limiting factor of diffraction and outresolving even the best lenses facts are really disappointing. So which one are you planning to buy in the future? Or maybe non of them? I want to have a Nikon D3s but it’s out of my reach at the moment. For the time being I’m leaning towards 600D with a kit lens and that prime you mentioned, or sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4 instead of kit lens as I really love to focus manually and I want to make some short movies and documentaries where I’ll need manual focus ring and I’ve read in photozone.de that manual focus is next to impossible with that kit lens although it is really a sharp lens as you mentioned.

            Thanks for the suggestion to the question ‘What kind of photos sells the best?’. Yeah, I myself really hate to copy others’ style. I don’t even follow the rules of third although I find myself shooting with the rules of the third without occurring that on my mind while composing pictures so many times.

            I have a question. How do you isolate fruits, people, objects etc with a white background like this http://arenacreative.com/food_drink_g37-two_ripe_strawberries_p6317.html

            http://arenacreative.com/objects_g55-game_controller_w_clipping_path_p5457.html
            Do you use some kind of papers, lighting etc or use photoshop?

            I agree with you, money isn’t everything and I too don’t live to eat but the vice verse applies to me as well. It’s my pleasure to talk to you and I’ve really already learned a lot from you through this blog, your site and by interacting with you through this comment page :)

          • http://blog.arenacreative.com/ ArenaCreative.com Stock Photos

            Thank you for your kind words, Firoza. It has always been my goal in this business to keep my overhead costs as low as possible, so building my kit has been a slow and drawn out process. When you get comfortable with what you’re shooting with, it just gets easier over time. This year I am going to pick up a few new lenses, I think. We’ll see what happens. I’ve been wanting to replace my 50mm f1.8 with the 1.4 and possibly even grab a 100mm macro, as they are also good for portrait work. Once you get a taste for primes, and their quality, there is almost no going back :) You just have to carry a lot more lenses along with you when you travel. Fortunately a lot of them are pretty lightweight. That’s another thing I think is very important in a kit, if you plan on traveling even just locally with your gear. You’re going to have to lug all of this stuff around in a bag or backpack, and it does get pretty heavy at times.

            For white isolations on a budget, you can get a cheap light tent online – honestly even better yet, you can construct your own practically for free with an old cardboard box lines with white paper, or cut out into a hollow cube, just covering the sides with white plastic garbage bag. Some have used a white shower curtain as well. The light once shot in through a strobe, through the sides or top, it bounces around like a superball. You can even get great results on a bright overcast day, using this type of setup, or a bright sunny day if you diffuse the light coming in on the top side of the light box. After you get it as best as you can in camera, you can later use Photoshop to remove any dark areas left, and to get it perfect http://arenacreative.com/blog/tutorials/dodge-tool-for-cleaning-up-white-isolations/ This old old old tutorial I made shows how you can even use this method with a really badly taken photo. This was just a pair of sunglasses shot on a white piece of poster board or paper, on a picnic table with my old canon powershot point and shoot.

            7d, 5d, who knows… I have gone back and forth so many times. I’m still trying to decide, myself – but I do hear the 7D RAW processing is much better using Lightroom 3, slightly lower noise levels as well. The popup flash is nice in minor cases when you need a bit of fill light, but I can live without that. I think I still will always long for full frame quality, so I think I am leaning more towards the 5d2 once they hit the used markets at a lower price. I bought my 40D for $450 and it’s been serving me very well for these last couple years. I can’t pay full price for anything, business expense or not. Being frugal helps tremendously when you are trying to keep overhead as low as possible to keep your profit margin higher, and to grow your business. Once I hit limits on what I can do with my certain setup, I’ll definitely upgrade my kit. For now, seeing that photography isn’t the only type of images I produce, it suits me. What suits you might be much different.

  • Pingback: Two epiphanies, one slump and one article « Nature Pic Mercenary