Before you think you’re finding a great deal on the newest model, look at the next few older ones in the series. Whether you choose Nikon or Canon, the glass will outlive many many camera bodies. You have to hold and feel them in your hands. Personally, I never really liked the smaller plastic DSLR’s, so I always went with older model prosumer bodies made of magnesium allow (Canon XXD series).  The thumb wheel (not sure what the proper name for it is) makes it so much easier to quickly change the settings.  On the Canon Digital Rebel series camera bodies, there is no wheel.

You have to remember, any older model dslr you can still purchase right now was amazing and mind blowing when it first came out, just a few years ago. Keeping up with the latest and greatest tech doesn’t make you a better photographer. Sure, they are tools – and newer features/technological help tremendously.  What lenses should you get?  That’s a whole other story.  For basic, starter, and cheap lenses… get the 50mm f1.8 (about $80-130 depending on Nikon or Canon).  I only know Canon, because that’s what I use.  There is nothing wrong with Nikon, or Pentac, or Olympus either!  You should try both, and see which button layout you like the most, and feel more comfortable with.  It won’t take long to test them out in a local store, and decide for yourself.  I went with Canon because I had a lot of friends also with Canon, and knew we could easily swap, trade, buy, sell, and/or borrow gear from one another.  I always saw that it was easier to buy used gear that was more readily available if I went with one of the main dslr manufacturers, Nikon or Canon.  Canon glass is a little bit cheaper than Nikon, from what I’ve seen too.  Just a tiny bit.  Another lens that is pretty standard is the 18-55 IS or VR lens.  This will cover a decent wide angle to mid zoom range for landscapes and portraits.  Once you get into the higher end lenses, the costs begin to surpass even the prices of the camera bodies themselves, as it should.  Bodies come and go, but good glass is forever (or at least until you drop it, and it breaks).  Don’t think you can’t make amazing pictures with basic starter and kit lenses.  Just look online, and you’ll see millions of folks already doing so.  I have been using my 18-55 IS lens and 50mm f1.8 lenses for almost 7 years now, and still use them to this day, along with my higher end L lenses.

I hope this post has helped – a final bit of advice, is to read read read the reviews online of whatever you’re interested in buying.  You can save SO much money by buying camera bodies use, and that are at least 3-5 years old.  Usually they depreciate in value down to about 25-40% of their original price, in a short matter of years.  Buy what you can afford, and don’t bite off more than you can chew until you know you are serious about photography.

PS: I’ll be updating our gear list with everything we use here at Arena Creative for our stock imagery, if you are looking for additional recommendations.

Some of the best places you can get lens recommendations from online are the top photography forums.  Check out the links at the end of this post.  Utilize your fellow photo gearheads on Twitter and Facebook, too.  Talk to your photography buddies, or any professionals you might know.  Ask them their opinions, and learn how they came to the conclusions they made on which lenses best suited their needs.

Try not to EVER rush into a lens purchase.  These aren’t pieces of gear you want to impulse-buy at all.  While you might end up with a great quality lens, you might be buying more than you need.  You’d better do your homework, unless you want to be like a clueless sucker walking into a car dealership, not knowing what the difference is between a Camaro or an Impala even is.  Salesman have one goal – to sell.  They will convince you that you need the best of the best, unless are smart enough to realize what you yourself personally need.  Salesmen could care less about saving you money.  Do auto repair shops try to convince you that you need more than you need?  Yes, almost always.  Do electronics stores try to sell you a warranty on anything you want to buy from them?  Of course, they do.  Don’t be a sucker.  Be an educated consumer, and save yourself some time and money.  It’s a pain to have to sell photography gear after you realize you’ve purchased something you don’t really use very much.

When I realized I needed a longer zange telephoto zoom lens, my initial goal was to pick up something basic and cheap.  My first 70-300 was garbage, made by Tamron under the name of Quantarray.  I picked it up second hand on craigslist for a whopping $55 and was actually impressed with the performance of it for the price, when I first got it.  As I went on, I began to realize that the thing had more purple fringing (CA / chromatic aberation) than any lens I had ever owned.  It would have suited a hobbyist just fine, or someone that didn’t care as much about good quality images.  It was capable of producing quality images, but the amount of mistakes you had to fix in post processing basically made it not even worth shooting with.  Now I have an L series 70-200 f4 (non-IS) I bought on ebay, along with a bing.com cashback rebate. There are always rebates and deals online, if you are internet savvy enough you should be able to find them.  When you zoom the aperture is fixed – I love it. Instead of the aperture changing from f3.5 to f5.6 throughout the zoom range, the L series Canon lens has a fixed aperture.  The ultrasonic auto focus is amazingly fast, and way more accurate than a lit lens. The quality of the images are unmatched compared to my older low end lenses, and the CA is so low that it’s just about non-existant. You definitely get what you pay for, when buying glass. Some kit glass is amazing, just having a few limitations. You just need to learn the limitations and invest your dollars wisely, according to the type of photography you do the most.

Uh, oh… I’m about to drop the “U word”.  USED!  Compare prices between new and used for everything you’re interested in buying, when it comes to photo gear.  Every piece of photographic equipment I have everpurchased was previously used.  With the exception of my nifty fifty, which is just about the same price new or used at around $80 USD.  I was the second owner on the rest of my gear, about 75% of it was used only briefly.  Seeing that photography is the type of hobby that many take up only to soon realize they dumped a bunch of money into something they either stink at, or just can’t afford, then that means there are a lot of regretful buyers out there trying to find a way to unload their expensive gear.  My first camera was a second body for a wedding photographer which was lightly used, and in mint condition.  My most recent camera body had just 4000 clicks on the shutter when I bought it, and not a scratch or nick on the exterior.  Both of those purchases saved me enough to buy another camera lens brand new, if I wanted to.

Once you get familiar with some of the more popular pro lenses, so many out there that will make you drool.  There are just way too many good lenses to buy, and never enough money.  If I bought what I “wanted” I could easily blow $10,000-$15,000 or more on glass.  If I bought what I really needed, well then I probably already have what I “need” for the type of work that I do.  What you’ve got to respect about Canon lenses is that genuine Canon glass hardly ever depreciates; L series lenses, especially.  My friend just sold his 70-200 f2.8 I about a month ago for what he bought it for, back 6 years ago.  Amazingly low depreciation.  Glass is always a good investment, and sometimes it helps to borrow or rent before you drop a ton of money. Low end Canon kit lenses like the 18-55 IS and the 55-250 IS, for example, have definitely depreciated in the used market over the past few years.  The 50mm f1.8 (the cheapest decent quality prime lens you buy) always seems to stay pretty solid around $80 new or used.

When you stick to buying glass that is made by your camera manufacturer (ie: Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Pentax) you generally don’t have to worry about older lenses not working with the newer Camera bodies that come out. I’ve heard that some older off brand lenses will stop working with updated Canon or Nikon cameras. Who needs the hassle of having to replace gear that they know works, but doesn’t work with their new upgraded body? Not that there aren’t some good quality off brand lenses, but usually when you stick to your manufacturer, it will turn out better in the long run.

Great sites for lens reviews and research:

Canon POTN Forums and Fred Miranda Forums are definitely my favorite places to talk gear and to read reviews online.
(these are also great places to buy or sell used photography equipment)

Canon POTN Forums
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/

Fred Miranda Forums
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/

Imaging-Resource
http://www.imaging-resource.com

DPreview
http://dpreview.com/

Lens Hero
http://www.lenshero.com

Lenshero is a pretty helpful type of site that helps “suggest” what type of lens you are looking for, according to your needs.  It allows you to enter in the lenses you already own, as well.  Remember that the site is set up in a way to drive affiliate sales to Amazon.com products, similarly to many other online review sites.  That doesn’t mean you can’t make your purchases elsewhere.

We’ve all heard the rave reviews about this full frame wonder – theCanon 5d mk2.  Here are some links I’ve collected with some impressivesamples to show you how well it performs.  I’ll add more here once Ifind samples that allow you to see the high resolution original imageand zoom in to view it at 100%.

ISO 1600:

http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&articleID=2128

dpreview.com Samples:

http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/canoneos5dmarkii_samples/

More Canon samples:

http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/eos5dm2/eos5dm2_sample-e.html

Has microstock devalued the industry? Sure it has. What once was a $500 photo sale has now turned into a $5 or even 50 cent photo sale.  But in general, the internet as well as digital photography have devalued the industry.  There are even websites being set up where people are posting links to our images, to download for free. One idiot buys them, and then shares them with the rest of the dishonest people that actually take part in the plundering and looting.  There’s really no stopping it, either.  There are contributors that can live comfortably off of a microstock income in many countries around the world.  Do you think these ones give a crap about devaluing the stock industry? Definitely not; they’re probably making a better living than they ever could before.

Traditional and old school photographers can sit around and whine about how much it sucks, or they can adapt to market trends.  Or, stay out of stock altogether.  Sure there’s still a market for macro stock, mid-stock, and rights managed. I personally dabble in a little of each.  Yes it’s nice when I make a photo sale for $400, but honestly if I relied just on those types of sales I wouldn’t be making enough to pay the bills.  Those sales for myself are few and far in between, compared to microstock sales, which are steady and in general, pretty reliable. Overall, the numbers for the rights managed and macro stocks are on the decline.  Getty was smart to acquire istockphoto (and they even recently bought stockxpert from Jupiter) so obviously they are trying to gain back their market share whatever ways possible.

Stock is only just one tiny corner of this incredible industry.  I started as a graphic designer, and even in that field it’s the same way.  You can focus on all sorts of corners of the creative industry…just pick one you enjoy doing the most, and obviously one you can pay the bills with.  If you can juggle a variety of things without trying to heat 6 pans on 4 burners, then go for it.  There are a lot of ways to make money in this business.  We can’t change how the market is, but we can fortunately pick and choose which areas we want to try and compete in.

It never ceases to amaze me…lately whenever I’m traveling every soccer mom, teenager, and senior citizen is rocking a DSLR of some sort.  If not a DSLR, then a state of the art point and shoot.  The technology is here, and it’s getting cheaper.  It’s so available, there is going to be a lot of competition in the future.  Thankfully for us there is a heck of a lot more to know in this business than just buying a camera and pressing the shutter.  BUT then comes the internet and google…where you can learn anything you want in a matter of minutes.  Maybe we’re all screwed

How long do you personally feel this microstock wave will last? A lot changes have happened in this business.  Agencies have come and gone, and there have been some buyouts and mergers.  I’ve been selling microstock for just 4 years now (EDIT 02-13-12: 7 year now) and there have been changes galore.  The question is…how long will this microstock wave last? Will it continue the way it is for years to come, or will it eventually get to the point where it’s not even worth the time?  What do you guys think?  If anyone is reading this – I’d love to hear your predictions.

Which stock photography agencies are the best for selling your images or even buying royalty free stock photos? Maybe you wonder if you can make any money selling your images online.  I wondered the same thing, back when I was a full time graphic designer.  I was purchasing hundreds of stock photos for use in my designs. Then I thought, “Hey – why can’t I sell my own photos?”. Professional stock photo collections can cost anywhere from $200-$500 per disc, with single traditional royalty free images costing anywhere from $80-$200 themselves. It’s thrilling to find places online where you can purchase high-resolution, professional quality images at a fraction of that price. In the past 5 or 6 years there has been a boom in the microstock photography and royalty free stock footage business. Many times I also talk with fellow artists that have their work only on one to three different agencies, and they ask, “Where else can I sell my photos where there are actually sales, and it is actually worth my time to submit?”.  Sometimes artists that are exclusive with istockphoto or any of the other larger agencies decide they don’t want to put all of their eggs in the same basket any more.  Of course it is more work to submit images to more places, but you need to figure out which balance is best suited for your own needs, according to how much time you have to invest each week, as well.

Which stock photo agencies are worthwhile?

Trying to see which site sells more images than the next is tricky.  There are a lot of elements involved, and it seems like sales figures fluctuate from month to month amongst the micro sites.  Factors like portfolio size, photo types, site search engines, and even categorization all play a part.  All I can do is give you my best sites – the ones that I personally think are worth my time to upload to. Below are the links to my top-selling sites – sign up, and try them out. Then you can make your own conclusions.    Here are my personal recommendations:

The All-Stars

Shutterstock

iStockPhoto

BigStockPhoto

Dreamstime

Fotolia

123 Royalty Free

CanStockPhoto

Slower Earners

Featurepics

Crestock

PantherMedia

MostPhotos

YAYmicro

ScanStockPhoto

Zazzle

Newer Promising Agencies:

GraphicLeftovers

Stockfresh

Veer Marketplace

DepositPhotos

The3DStudio

Pond5 Stock Footage

The above links are also excellent places to buy stock images.  I also sell images from my own portfolio and other select artists here at ArenaCreative.com at budget prices.  At present, we have thousands of images to choose from, ranging everywhere from graphics, to vector art, to lifestyle photography.

Everyone creates different types of art, and some of it is very marketable.  Some has high commercial value, while a lot does not.  It might look great, and you might want to make a print of it for your grandmother, but that doesn’t mean you’re going to be able to make enough money to make a living.  How do you know how well you’ll do?  You have to try it for yourself.  Then make your own conclusions. This is definitely not a get rich quick scheme.  You will “get back” out of stock photography, what you “put into it”.

Don’t forget to subscribe to the blog at the upper right of this page. I’ve consulted so many for free on how to get started over the years, only to find that I have less and less time for it.  Especially when the majority of people I’ve spent hours helping, never ended up going through with regularly submitting images Like I said, stock is definitely not for everyone.  Lots of people give it a shot and then realize how much work is involved.  My time is  valuable, as is yours, but if you are interested in one-on-one consulting regarding your microstock efforts, feel free to contact me for further info.  I highly recommend the Expanded Microstock Photographer’s guide – a really affordable ebook by Rasmus Rasmussen, a 10 year veteran in the world of microstock photography.